Top 5 Authentic Bigfoot Stories
Check out this list from Swamp Dweller of 5 of the most authentic bigfoot sightings caught on video.
Let us know what you think.
BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Here is the first report I have read about the Bigfoot Conference that was held in Hastings, Nebraska this weekend.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.omaha.com/news/nebraska/nebraska-bigfoot-believers-talk-sasquatch-in-hastings/article_43f09381-e25c-526c-bf57-4aa4b3298b52.html
As I witnessed last year when I attended the 1st conference there seem to be plenty of vendors selling Bigfoot related merchandise. No one is going to get rich of course but it probably helps fund their hobby for some. Numbers are always hard to gauge however the attendance reported seemed surprising low based on what I witnessed last year. I have to say the story about the Bigfoot sighting in an alfalfa field in the Sand Hills was interesting as I can attest there is not much cover in that part of the state to conceal one's self. I will pass on anything additional I may find about the conference.
Although lktomi and I disagree about the existence of Bigfoot,I will say he was perceptive in realizing the "curious" comments from yesterday was indeed not me. Although I may not disagree with the other "curious" in principle I find no need for personal insults as the weight of the argument will suffice for me.
I remain puzzled as to why so many report seeing a "Bigfoot" if they do not exist. I do not believe all are intentionally lying although I do believe many are simply mistaken in what they seen and remember. As far as the "evidence" is concerned I would simply say it's importance is in the eye of the beholder.
One thing I intend to check out when I have the time (it's always about finding free time for me) is looking more into the PGF film timeline. I have always thought that was the weak link in the authenticity of the film however lktomi brought up some points that I would like to further explore. Whoever posted that comment saying the timeline discredited the whole Patty story has now got me interested in looking at it once again more intently. As time provides I will do so.
Curious... When two people see a “Bigfoot” at the same time, let’s say an encounter on a road where there’s no room for misidentification, surely it comes down to one other possibility and that’s potentially lying? That’s the thing, if most reports don’t occur through dense brush... then most of the reports are either lies or factual. And that’s an awful lot of people allegedly lying when the physical evidence for it has stacked up for decades.
DeleteAs for the PGF timeline “issue”, there have been professionals consulted who have claimed it takes many, many hours... and there are those that claim it takes an hour WITH copies. The lines are that blurry. I can tell you now, you’ll come to the same stalemate with conjecture on both sides... when the impossible “costume” still remains and needs addressing.
As for “vending machines”, I tore Stuey a new one in the dog man thread only earlier.
You’ve convinced me Iktomi, I’m now a bigfoot believer! Thank you for providing the key piece of evidence to push me over the edge!
DeleteLOL - in spite of the obvious sarcasm I will have to differ with my doppelganger on this one. There was a time when I certainly entertained the thought of Bigfoot existing but the passage of time has now made me beyond skeptical. I just can't wrap my head around the fact that despite so many years having passed with so many aware and looking for it that one still hasn't been found. We certainly have enough advanced technology which is readily available to any who wish to use it to get the job done. Lately it just seems we've been getting mainly stories instead of solid evidence. Unless something substantial comes to light in the future I will remain a disbeliever in the actual physical existence of Bigfoot.
DeleteThe mystery remains however - what are people seeing? Many can make out things that simply aren't there . . . as has been demonstrated on this very site.
Every time someone comes into contact with a hominin that would be described within the definition of “found”, one or both parties are equalled in enough intelligence to retreat from the situation... relegating the event to an anecdote rather than what many would perceive as an official discovery, classification, etc. For instances where differing temperaments might occur, there are plenty of missing hunters. As for “seeing things that aren’t there”... This is the kind of thing “sceptics” take and run with, with a fundamental flaw;
Delete• Witnesses substantially changed their description of a perpetrator (including key information such as height, weight and presence of facial hair) after they learned more about a particular suspect.
• Witnesses only made an identification after multiple photo arrays or lineups — and then made hesitant identifications (saying they “thought” the person “might be” the perpetrator, for example), but at trial the jury was told the witnesses did not waver in identifying the suspect.
http://www.innocenceproject.org/understand/Eyewitness-Misidentification.php
... You see, if eyewitnesses make missidentifications regarding key information of an incident, they rarely make missidentifications of the actual incident. For example, multiple witnesses to a giant hairy human stepping out into the road may make missidentifications regarding weight, height, whether it had hair on its face... But not that the giant hairy human stepped out into the road. The cognitive dissonance that tens of thousands of people are lying, when these people have Johor but ridicule waiting for them, doesn’t add up.
Who’s Johor?
DeleteIt’s a place... and quite clearly a typo.
DeleteAnd what about instances where multiple witnesses are in fact in DENIAL about their experiences? Only to have these opinions changed after reflection, being better educated about the subject, or by means of supporting evidence that turns up (example provided below)? This happens an awful lot which is conveniently forgotten about. In fact, given the fact that most witnesses are likely in the statistical majority of the population who don’t believe in such creatures, this eradicates any possibility that powers of suggestion are molding their conclusions as to what they’re experiencing. You have to remember, that 99% of researchers have never seen a Bigfoot (though innumerable have come across excellent physical evidence), or if they have, it was an experience before they even knew they existed which has set them on a quest to verifying such experiences.
DeleteReport # 6804 (Class A)
Submitted by witness on Saturday, August 23, 2003.
Two ourtdoorsmen chased by a large bear like biped recount 25+ years of strange occurrences.
YEAR: 1995 to 2003
SEASON: Unknown
STATE: Ohio
COUNTY: Butler County
LOCATION DETAILS: From I-75 take State Route 73 west into Trenton. Once you get in town look for the Skate Way Roller Rink then make a right follow it till you have to turn right or left then make a right. Follow it till it dead ends. There will be the woods and creek in front of you. there is 96.6 acres of woods there with about another 100 to the left and about 105 up on the hill.
NEAREST TOWN: Trenton
NEAREST ROAD: State Route 73
OBSERVED: My friend and I have been camping, hunting and fishing a part of Butler County that would be the last place I ever thought I would be so afraid that I would wet myself. From about 1985 to 2003 he and I have went to these woods to camp and fish the creek that runs to the river. One calm night we were camping about four miles from the nearest dirt road. We had a small fire and our tents were already up and we were talking about fishing and catching the big one when we heard a sound that neither he or I could explain. Both of us thought wolf or something? We stayed by the fire and talked some more about fishing then we got a strong odor of something like dead flesh or something like that. We then got up and took the light and started looking for the source of the smell and sound we heard. As we got closer to the middle of the forest my friend said listen....we could hear something moving towards us. We started running and could hear that it was getting closer to us. We made it to a clearing where we could see the moon and the sky very well so we could catch our breath. Then, there it was, "a bear" I said!! I raised my shot gun and fired it in the air but it didn't stop coming towards us (it was on two legs the whole time). We ran in the creek and out of the woods until we reached a store and called my wife to come get us. We told her what happened but she laughed at us. She later asked us if it could have been Bigfoot. We both said no back then but as time has gone by we have found small trees broken off above 10 feet and footprints that only it could make so we thought we should make this report. On August 22, 2003, my friend and I were fishing at the river and we heard the same sound we have heard for the last 25 years. We think there is a Bigfoot that lives somewhere in the woods or passes through regularly where we camp, fish, and hunt. Everyone who lives in this small city by these woods can tell you we believe this to be true.
http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=6804
Like I mentioned earlier, I have very little free time and certainly not enough to wade through any of the worthies crap you’ve posted. Good day to you.
DeleteStuey... I knew the stuff I was going to publish was a little too advanced for you, so I never expected anything else. Maybe when I return in the morning, someone might have contributed something worth reading.
DeleteYou take care now champ.
Now here's a classic sample of denial, you're finally good for something Lucy ^
DeleteHere's a ghost sighting:
DeleteVictorian Lady
Location: Charlesworth (Derbyshire) - Main road running out of moors
Type: Haunting Manifestation
Date / Time: Late twentieth century, estimated 22:00h - 00:00h
Further Comments: Four people driving into Charlesworth watched a semi-transparent lady in Victorian dress complete with ruff walk across the road and through a gate.
Cool! Maybe they did see it! Be even cooler if they had PHYSICAL EVIDENCE to verify the presence of the ghost in that immediate area eh?
DeleteMaybe you can apply mermaids to the above sighting next again? Since three isn’t three whole databases of reports for them, there isn’t thousands of years of oral histories that are contemporary to reports from other cultures, and there isn’t enough physical evidence to be able to ascertain average height & weight ratios... not to mention being able to point to Gaussian Distribution.
DeleteYou’ll be telling me the scientific method can be applied to conspiracy theories again next.
Mermaids are as real as bigfoot regardless of all the databases you bigfoot role-players concoct.
DeleteSchooled.
Looky here! I done saw a 9 foot tall hairy man in them woods.
DeleteYes, sir! I'll put that in my bigfoot database. The Welsh will eat it right up.
If mermaids are as real as “Bigfoot”, then point to the same frequency of reports, the physical evidence as well as the stuff that’s published. You really do struggle with these attempts at sensationalism, don’t you Stu?
DeleteI would worry about the evidence that has to on some level, be substantiating a level of the reports in those databases... not about the Welsh. That’s where your cognitive dissonance lies.
But there are anglo oral histories about mermaids , not native American but same evidence you site, also fossil evidence of fish tails prove something with the tail of a fish swam the seas, surely by using your standards we have proven mermaids, I can't wait for the fringe science journal to put the icing on the cake
DeleteAll old maritime maps had drawings of mermaids and sea monsters, unless, gasp, they were full of crap snd those stories and fossils don't prove anything? No its documented so we know its true
DeleteOh Lucy you are a stupid girl
DeleteSearchingforbigfoot.com $$$$$$ Google the company's worth, I dare you,brrrrrrr
DeleteMermaids reports are cross cultural as well. I guess these cultures got together hundreds of years ago in a grand conspiracy just to fool ikdummy.
DeleteThe ocean is vast but what is the probability that there are 10000 10 foot tall hairy ape men hiding in US woods? ikdummÿ doesn't want to address his flawed, impossible, 0 probability premise...
Lucy is the queen of denial
DeleteUlysses saw mermaids, predates Bigfoot
DeleteOooh, maybe Cyclops was a one eyed Bigfoot, maybe, Lucy check into that, good written evidence for you , mermaids and sea monsters and Bigfoot all together, creatures of the Gods, fantastical!
DeleteWhy is ikdummy called Lucy?
DeleteShe likes that name,call her that all the time
Deleteikdummy believes that there are 10000 10 foot tall hairy men conspiring to hide in US woods. ikdummy also believes that religious people and the government conspire to cover it up.
DeleteNow ikdummy says that non bigfoot role players are conspiracy theorists. LOL ikdummy....
No... There is mythology of mermaids and cyclops. There are no “Anglo oral histories”, because Europe have had their history’s written down through the ages. And there is no mention of this in such written archives. I can’t quite believe that I’m having to explain this to an adult. Nobody is seeing mermaids. There is no footage of mermaids that has physical evidence attached to it (the tracks in the PGF sand bar) with the same morphological traits of that physical evidence being documented in other continents by government employees.
DeleteThe probability that there are “10000 10 foot tall hairy ape men hiding in US woods” is very high, since there is reliable, peer reviewed scientific data to substantiate them. If something doesn’t exist... it isn’t seen on average 200 times a year, and doesn’t leave 60 years of physical evidence that people can ascertain average height & weight ratios, not to mention point to Gaussian distribution. Mermaids; not so much.
Where is your published study by probability experts, ikdummy? The musings of a drunken welsh"man" are meaningless.
Delete...and people SAYING they saw bigfoot is not the same as SEEING, you gullible idiot.
What’s the relevance of probability, and what example in field biology can you reference pre-classification where it’s mattered? Where does probability usually get published? What I reference isn’t my “musings”... it’s the long-term research and subsequent approval of PhD’s.
DeleteThat’s an awful lot of people SAYING they’re seeing “Bigfoot”. Some would say that it would take an impossible hoaxing conspiracy theory, with everyone in cahoots over hundreds of years across continents. Psychologists state that conspiracies provide the people using them with an explanation for those events over which they cannot exert control. This is especially true when the alternative account feels threatening.
Who in their right minds would be gullible enough to believe a thousands’ years old, globe-hopping, hoaxing conspiracy theory?
ikdummy: "What's the relevance of probability?"
DeleteLOL... bigfoot role-play at it's most ignorant. I get it ikdummy. You now try to turn around everything that has been said about bigfooters. Now, people that DON'T believe in bigfoot are gullible, conspiracy theorists. Got it. Good "reasoning" style...
Um... you didn’t answer the question, Stuey. What's the relevance of probability?
DeleteActually Stuey... it’s irony in its most poetic form. The tables have turned and I don’t think you can quite cope with it, can you? One of us has the scientific method. I can point to peer review on tracks impressions made by the PGF subject. You however have conjecture and hoaxing conspiracy theories. The irony here being that for years you’ve demanded peer review... And now you’re stuck in your own flip sided bubble of pseudoscience with nothing but faith that people are lying, hoaxing and being fraudulent.
So... What's the relevance of probability?
Ask a probability expert what relevance probability has to there being 10000 10 foot tall apemen hiding in US woods uncaptured for 50 years.. It's a whole scientific field dedicated to likelihood.
DeleteIgnore a whole aspect of scientific theory tho....
But what relevance does it have on biological research? Do you have any examples of it being applied to biological research, Stuey? If something is being shown to exist via data, what would the relevance of probability be on its existence after the fact? You’re not making any sense, Stuey.
DeleteHere’s a question... have you ever consulted a probability expert on the existence of “Bigfoot” to know?
Many call bigfootery pseudoscience and now ikdummy calls them pseudoscience back.
DeleteWe get it, ikdummy. Your new tact is try to turn around everything said about you.
I’m sorry... are you calling the peer review process pseudoscience, Stuey?
DeletePlease explain...
It's musings, nothing referenced by Lucy is factual
DeleteHey Lucy , prove there's no oral history of mermaids ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
DeleteWho are you talking to Stuart??
DeleteLucy finally admits people make money off Bigfoot , it took her a long time
DeleteHey Stuey... how about you point to oral hitsdoes of mermaids first. And you didn’t answer two very vital questions...
Delete1. Are you calling the peer review process pseudoscience?
2. Have you ever consulted a probability expert on the existence of “Bigfoot”?
Stuey... People make money from Bigfoot. I acknowledged that the day your obsession with it surfaced. It’s whether they’re doing it fraudulently via hoaxing to line their pockets... Or deserve it for hard word in order for furthering funds for research.
DeleteHow about you debunk it, can you? Nope. Probability experts point out lack of evidence as proof Bigfoot doesn't exist
DeleteName one person making money off of Bigfoot? Sound familiar Lucy? Your a terrible liar
DeleteNice how you rewrite history just like you make up scientific evidence
DeleteWhat, debunk British oral histories on mermaids? I don’t have to, it doesn’t exist in the first place, Stuey.
DeleteSo you’re saying that not only do you have no clue what a probability expert might has to say about the existence of Bigfoot, after harping on about it for hours (oh deary me), but you’re now suggesting that they would use misinformed circular logic as a basis for such probability?
Sorry Stuey... could you please point to an example of British mermaid oral histories? I’m trying to establish what part of Biritish history you’re suggesting I’m rewriting...
DeleteSo you've failed to debunk it and now you're mad because probability experts discount Bigfoot, seethe on Lucy ,it's funny
DeleteYou haven’t provided anything for me to debunk. You haven’t provided one probability example made by anyone.
DeleteThere is nothing... just like your contact list.
I'm sure Todd will win those court cases with all this scientific evidence , shall we make a little wager that if he loses you leave here, why if he wins I'll leave, with all that scientific evidence the court will have no choice , how could you turn down this offer?
DeleteYou can't debunk fact, thank you, I win again Lucy
DeleteOh dear, another bet? You’re still reeling from the last one Stuey. What Todd Standing does with his court case has no bearing on any of the evidence I’m currently referencing.
DeleteSorry Stuey : (
Since you consistently fail to present any facts everything you say is immediately debunked
DeleteScared to bet on your scientific of Bigfoot , priceless, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
DeleteHere we go Stuey;
Deletehttp://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf
Those are the facts I’m going by of late. Your turn... how about come links to facts for the points you’ve raised in the last 48 hours?
1. Are you calling the peer review process pseudoscience?
2. Have you ever consulted a probability expert on the existence of “Bigfoot”?
Just because you call garbage "facts" doesn't make it so, sorry. Of course we'll see how those "facts" hold up in court, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
DeleteThere is as of yet no science presented by Todd Stuey. I know you have major struggles understanding how it works... maybe one day eh?
DeleteProbability ikdummy, THEN delve in to to your bs. Premise, ikdummy, premise.
DeleteFunny how you seem to be the only one who " understands " it Lucy, we know how special you are ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
DeleteSo where is the expert touting this probability? Surely you have something to represent the experts you’ve been referring to for the past few hours?
DeleteWell Lucy thats enough fun for one day, sorry you doubt your own "science ", not that I blame you ,love you Lucy, you're always good fun with your imaginary giant forest friends
DeleteGoogle it Lucy, just like the millionaires, billionaires, all true even though you seethe about it,alllllll true lady
DeleteStuey... you never answered the questions;
Delete1. Are you calling the peer review process pseudoscience?
2. Have you ever consulted a probability expert on the existence of “Bigfoot”?
Stuey... if you can point to an example of science in Todd’s work, I’ll happily take a bet with you. Your immaturity and down right stupidity about recognising science isn’t to my detriment. And you’re not going anywhere Stuey. Your blood’s up and how could dodging those questions give you any satisfaction?
You’re coming across unhinged, Stuey... come on champ. Maybe have some time off and compose yourself a little?
DeleteScience will win out in court Lucy , why so afraid ? Hmmmm sorry to spook you but I'm flattered you can't forget me, I am the champ at your expense, after all you've failed to offer up any proof or facts with all your cut and paste but I don't need to tell you or anyone here that
Deleteikdummy can't conceive that he is communicating with 2 completely different people.
Deleteikdummy, I've never called you Lucy, and am not sure what the reference "Lucy" refers to, but it seems to fit.
Didn’t go very far, did you Stuey?
Delete1. Are you calling the peer review process pseudoscience?
2. Have you ever consulted a probability expert on the existence of “Bigfoot”?
Proof that something with the same widely reported anamtomty as “Bigfoot” is leaving its physical sign on the environment of he US and China;
http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf
Don’t like it? Do something about it.
Lucy fits well indeed,a big girl ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
DeleteSure Stuey... just like 10,000 hoaxers are running around the woods of the US.
DeleteEh?
Glad you admit it, see thats the good thing about Bigfoot , open a tourist museum and through out some "facts " and " science " about Bigfoot , not enough to prove anything, don't want to get sued for lying. Those rubes will come a running
DeleteQuotation marks aren’t finding you these actual billionaires and probability expert Stuey!
DeleteChop, chop!!
Who said there were 10000 hoaxers are running around the woods of the US?
DeleteTrying to turn all the hurt around?
Yes... Because the words “10,000 10 foot ape men” always debunked scientific data and got me so upset.
DeleteBut surely there would have to be tha many people in on this hoaxing conspiracy, Stuey? The people in the mountains placing tracks, the people running around in gorilla costumes, the multiple people making reports, the amount of people off on Bigfoot camping excursions all “role-playing”...
10,000 people easily... right Stuey?
Chop, publicly traded company even though you seethe and cry, chop any fool, even you, can look it up, chop even his son joined in chop chop chop
DeleteIt does upset you because you respond EVERY time
DeleteWhat an abject failure.
Delete• no example of role-players.
• no example of Bigfoot millionaires.
• no example of PGF costume.
• no example of hoaxing conspiracy theory.
• now, no example of probability experts (whater that was meant to mean in the first place).
... It’s ok Stuey. You at least have “duh Bigfoot don’t exist”, right?
Billionaires , you stand corrected as always ,but you just go ahead with your denial
DeleteA good old fashioned debunking would upset me Stuey, not your unreferenced, uneducated, illogical ramblings.
DeleteNothing to debunk since you've shown nothing
DeleteWhere aren’t these billionaires Stuey?
DeleteYour cognitive dissonance for your religion does not amount to nothing.
Deletealso when you lose will you take off your undies and streak naked through your local Welsh town with photos to prove it ?
DeleteAnd your consistent failures are why you seethe and attempt to appear educated
Delete• iktomi is an example of role-players.
Delete• never said Bigfoot millionaires.
• The P/G is the example of PGF costume.
• what is the hoaxing conspiracy theory, you came up with that?
• examples of probability experts are people with degrees related to probability.
... It’s ok ikdummy. You at least have “duh Bigfoot exist”, right? Have a salad.
Does not amount to nothing
DeleteLucy
Stuey... In the time I’ve been here, I’ve seen world class geneticists conduct DNA studies, I’ve seen the evidence I’ve referenced get peer reviewed... what failures are you referring to exactly?
DeleteWhat do you have again? A hoaxing conspiracy theory of 10,000 hoaxers running around the wood of the US. Wow... just wow...
Boy Lucy you sure mangle the English language when you seethe and get all upset, flustered when cornered?
DeleteYes Bigfoot are nephilim, what fools we are
DeleteWow is right, you're seriously nuts
Delete• “iktomi is an example of role-players” - you’d have to debunk the evidence I reference first.
Delete• “never said Bigfoot millionaires” - oh you have, and now assert there are Bigfoot Billionaires.
• “The P/G is the example of PGF costume.” - last time I checked, circular logic didn’t manifest a magic monkey suit.
• “what is the hoaxing conspiracy theory, you came up with that?” - no Stuey. If everyone on the planet is lying and hoaxing about this subject, your words, with all their descriptive and behavioural consistencies... it would require a consorted effort on the part of tens of thousands of people.
• “examples of probability experts are people with degrees related to probability.” - cool. Where are their opinions on the subject of Bigfoot?
10,000 hoaxers running around the US, who would believe it?
wow just wow,,,and weak just weak
Deleteikdummy's seen no dna linking to a bigfoot.
ikdummy's seen a hoax peer reviewed in a fringe pseudoscience rag.
ikdummy's now come up with a 10,000 hoaxer conspiracy theory which he attributes to others.
Wow, more "facts" , guess the court will rule Bigfoot exists , right Lucy? Take my bet you big girl
DeleteTens of thousands because ....what, because you say so, you sure like to pull things out of your rump, and since we've proven you lie we can go ahead and dismiss all that, what else do yku have?
DeleteNOTHING
DeleteActually Stuey... I’ve seen a world class geneticist theorise that hominids survived on the planet as late as 150 years ago. I’ve seen the PGF, your biggest nightmare, have the scientific method applied and peer reviewed by an editorial board of PhD’s.
DeleteStuey... remember, this is all “role-playing”. This is all “hoaxes & lies”. Please be responsible for your own wild assertions, you intellectually backward coward. It’s only when you have someone point out your logical shortfalls that you try and distance yourself form them.
Searchingforbigfoot.com $$$$$$$$
DeleteBUT STUEY... surely there would have to be that many people in on this hoaxing conspiracy, eh? The people in the mountains placing tracks, the people running around in gorilla costumes, the multiple people making reports, the amount of people off on Bigfoot camping excursions all “role-playing”...
DeleteHow many people would you claim is up to all that? Please be accountable for one of the many messes in your life
(100th comment again)
DeleteMeldrum(your brain) said 10000 bigfoot.
Deleteikdummy(brainless) invented 10000 hoaxers.
surely ikdummy acknowledges hoaxers? surely ikdummy can recall calling DS a hoaxer? Surely ikdummy has read that Freeman admitted to hoaxing? Surely ikdummy has heard Dyer admit that he hoaxes. Surely, ikdummy admits there are other hoaxers? Surely people have conspired to hoax bigfoot, ikdummy? So, ikdummy believes in bigfoot conspiracies. Wow just wow.
Ok then Stuey... If not 10,000 hoaxers, how many? How many people are in the mountains placing tracks, running around in gorilla costumes, making reports and in Bigfoot camping excursions all “role-playing” and “hoaxing and lying”?
DeleteIf not 10,000, many people would that take?
Sure! Hoaxers exist... that’s not my assertion. Your assertion is that it’s all hoaxing, lying and role-playing. That’s your claim Stuey. Be accountable for that and put a number on how many people that would take? It’s not a difficult question.
DeleteConsider it your five minutes of fame in challenging Meldrum, look...
(CREASED)
Oh and Stuey? Freeman never admitted to hoaxing... he admitted to making fake feet to test the evidence he was documenting.
DeleteSo many questions... so many sad, sad, sad deflections. I’ll be back tomorrow morning to see if you have the belly to answer that question Stuey. And don’t think I’m gonna let this go.
Delete: p
Wow I sure made you angry, that was easy
DeleteHa ha ha ha!!
DeleteSure Stuey... we’ll see how angry we get in the coming days.
Night, night sweetheart.
you forgot misidentification of bear, ghili suits, tree stumps, paredolia, imagination, drugs, wishful thinking, etc ikdummy
DeleteYes, ikdummy, everything bigfoot is made up and you continue to deflect from probability...and I didn't post that i made you angry...but...that doesn't matter because all anons are the same person and "Stu" is from Leeds because you did a gig there. Got it. You're ik"dummy".
Didn’t answer the questions Stuey... you assert hoaxing goes on, and you assert people are role-playing.
DeleteHow many?
I’ll check on you tomorrow... Night, night. x
wow, stuey just got royally charred by Iktomi and he continues to come back asking for more punishment !
Deleteit must be true what they say about stu being a glutton for punishment !
Cheers
Joe
You didn't follow up on your entire faulty premise, ikdummy. Worry about probability before you count your bigfoot.
DeleteWell I'm not one to root around in my bum for phony numbers like Lucy and Joe, at least he admitted he made up those numbers , more loose "facts" from Lucy, answer your own stupid questions Lucy, we're not secretaries for you, no Google in your shitehole country?
DeleteWell I checked in and typically enough - nout. Stuey... there is no relevance of “probability” to biological research. You used it as a genuine strawman (that’s the defitnion of strawman Stuey; a misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument), trouble is, not even our strawman was based on factual data. You don’t have one single example of probability applied to this subject. For example, if I was to use the claim that mathematicians or Astro physicists had contributed to proving Bigfoot existed, people would be asking me to provide an example. These are the requirements of basic adult debate... and you clearly don’t understand how it works. And then you have the audacity to call “loose facts”? I know I’m being trolled and typing anything in an effort to try and aggravate us more important that substance on your part, but it appears you’ll make a fool of yourself in pursuit of the same end. That’s like a very stupid dog chasing its tail, Stuey. You’re the blog’s village idiot, bar none.
DeleteAnd to one of many questions you’re too cowardly to answer. Since you claim that everyone associated with this subject is role-playing, lying and hoaxing when they’re not misidentifying... I’m happy to put a minimum predicted number to it. The funny thing is, and you know this since you wouldn’t respond, is that even 10,000 people running around the woods of the US reads like an embarrassing thing to claim.
And I’m gonna rub it in that fat face of yours for a good while.
Straw is too solid a foundation for yout garbage , rub my face in your phony made up numbers that now you won't repeat , too funny.
DeleteYou dont think probability experts can give you the odds as to whether 10000, 10 ft tall bigfoot could successfully hide in US forests for 50 years?
DeleteWhy, because you never asked one? LOL
Find a probability expert, dunce, or your latest irrelevant blithering is added to the ever growing vomit pile of failure.
DeleteLOLAZ.
BIGFOOT BILLIONAIRE $$$$$? SEARCHINGFORBIGFOOT.COM
ReplyDelete